Twenty-six views of free will

Thinkers

Each page sets out one view, the argument that drives it, an interactive figure, and where it meets and parts from Dennett. The map shows roughly how far each stands from him. To see where you would stand, take the quiz.

A map of the thinkers by distance from Dennett, from his allies on the left to the free will sceptics on the right Dennett Frankfurt Fischer P. F. Strawson Hume Hobbes Mele The Stoics Aristotle Spinoza Deutsch Laplace Schopenhauer Libet Wegner Augustine William James Popper Epicurus Kant Kane van Inwagen Harris Caruso Pereboom G. Strawson Sapolsky closest to Dennett furthest away
A rough map, not a measurement. Distance means disagreement with Dennett about free will: whether it is compatible with a world of causes, and whether we have it. There are two ways to be far from him. Libertarians such as Kane and van Inwagen say we are free because the world is not fully determined; sceptics such as Sapolsky and Caruso say we are not free at all.
A dim interior with a great spiral staircase; an old man sits in thought by a sunlit window while a woman tends a fire in the shadows
Rembrandt, Philosopher in Meditation, 1632. Musée du Louvre, Paris. Light from the window, a fire in the dark, and a staircase that winds out of sight: a fitting image for a problem that has been argued over for two and a half thousand years.Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

The allies

Compatibilists who, like Dennett, think responsibility does not depend on a gap in nature's causes, and the philosopher who did most to show that neuroscience has not refuted free will.

The long history

From the Greeks to the nineteenth century: the first compatibilists, the first defenders of an open future, and the images that still frame the debate, from the swerving atom to Laplace's demon.

The scientists

Experiments on the timing of decisions and the feeling of will, and a biologist's case that there is no free will at all.

The far side

Contemporary philosophers who reject Dennett's compatibilism, in two opposite directions: libertarians, who think we are free because the world is not determined, and sceptics, who think no one is free in the way that matters.

Between clocks and clouds

A philosopher of science who looked for freedom between perfect determinism and pure chance, and a physicist who found room for it in the multiverse.

Not on the list? Leibniz, Thomas Reid, Roderick Chisholm's agent causation and Susan Wolf's reason view are explained in the glossary, and every view is set side by side on the comparison page.